Image by Zakir RushanlyNIH’s database is a good place for any medical student to use in research. In reading about the NIH Peer Review process, applicants have to go through and pass two review boards to be granted money to start the applied research. The review board strives in promoting a fair and unbiased process. This is to ensure the highest quality of research in biomedical science. I believe this is a good site for articles due to the core values used in each selection of the researchers. The core values are “(1) expert assessment, (2) transparency, (3) impartiality, (4) fairness, (5) confidentiality, (6) security, (7) integrity, and (8) efficiency.” (NIH Peer Review: Grants and Cooperative Agreements 2019)
ARE YOU STUCK WITH THIS NURS 6003 DISCUSSION: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY? ORDER NOW!
Reference
Han Q, Zheng B, Daines L, Sheikh A. (2022). Long-Term Sequelae of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of One-Year Follow-Up Studies on Post-COVID Symptoms. Pathogens. 2022 Feb 19;11(2):269. PMID: 35215212; PMCID: PMC8875269. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020269
National Library of Medicine. (2019). NIH Peer Review: Grants and Cooperative Agreements. NIH Peer Review – National Institutes of Health. Retrieved September 12, 2022, from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/PeerReview22713webv2.pdf
Image by Zakir Rushanly
Related posts:
NURS 6003 Week 1 Discussion: Networking Opportunities
NURS 6003 Discussion: Strategies for Academic Portfolios
">I decided to research covid survivors’ long-term symptoms. In doing this, I did a google search of Peer review Post Covid 19 long-term symptoms. There were multiple articles that were presented for this area. I selected an article from the National Library of Medicine (NIH). This website is well known for factual information. I choose this specific area since I am a family nurse practitioner that rounds in the hospital and 2 nursing homes. I see a lot of post-covid symptoms in the covid survivors. I am going to be using the “Long-Term Sequelae of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of One-Year Follow-Up Studies on Post-COVID Symptoms” article for my peer-reviewed article during this assignment.
NIH’s database is a good place for any medical student to use in research. In reading about the NIH Peer Review process, applicants have to go through and pass two review boards to be granted money to start the applied research. The review board strives in promoting a fair and unbiased process. This is to ensure the highest quality of research in biomedical science. I believe this is a good site for articles due to the core values used in each selection of the researchers. The core values are “(1) expert assessment, (2) transparency, (3) impartiality, (4) fairness, (5) confidentiality, (6) security, (7) integrity, and (8) efficiency.” (NIH Peer Review: Grants and Cooperative Agreements 2019)
ARE YOU STUCK WITH THIS NURS 6003 DISCUSSION: USING THE WALDEN LIBRARY? ORDER NOW!
Reference
Han Q, Zheng B, Daines L, Sheikh A. (2022). Long-Term Sequelae of COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of One-Year Follow-Up Studies on Post-COVID Symptoms. Pathogens. 2022 Feb 19;11(2):269. PMID: 35215212; PMCID: PMC8875269. https://doi.org/10.3390/pathogens11020269
National Library of Medicine. (2019). NIH Peer Review: Grants and Cooperative Agreements. NIH Peer Review – National Institutes of Health. Retrieved September 12, 2022, from https://grants.nih.gov/grants/PeerReview22713webv2.pdf
Image by Zakir Rushanly
Related posts:
NURS 6003 Week 1 Discussion: Networking Opportunities
NURS 6003 Discussion: Strategies for Academic Portfolios
Struggling with online classes or exams? Get expert help to ace your coursework, assignments, and tests stress-free!